Comparing Green: Washing - Hushing - Wishing

by VesselBot’s Marketing Team

March 12, 2024
greenwashing - greenhushing - greenwishing

It's increasingly noticeable that there's a surge in words and phrases related to environmental responsibility. It feels like every day, a new buzzword is floating around, such as "greenwashing", "greenhushing" and "greenwishing." 

But what exactly do these terms mean, and why are they important?

New terminology is being coined to describe emerging environmental concepts and challenges, reflecting the growing urgency surrounding today’s ecological issues.
By understanding these environmental terms and adopting environmentally responsible practices, companies can actively contribute to positive change and sustainable outcomes for our planet.

So, before we dive deeper into the discussion, let's take a closer look at what greenwashing, greenhushing, and greenwishing really entail.

Green Definitions (According to KPMG US):

  • Greenwashing: A practice employed by businesses to portray themselves as more sustainable than they truly are. This often involves providing misleading information about their products or labeling a fund as “green” when it’s not. It's crucial to recognize that greenwashing exists along a spectrum, ranging from deliberate deception to well-intentioned but misguided attempts to appear sustainable.
  • Greenhushing: A practice in which the company withholds ESG information from the public. While not necessarily dishonest, this lack of transparency can hinder stakeholders' ability to accurately assess a company's sustainability efforts. Without access to comprehensive data, customers, investors, and other stakeholders may struggle to evaluate a company's climate targets, share insights on decarbonization strategies, or calculate Scope 3 emissions.
  • Greenwishing: A practice in which a company hopes to meet ambitious sustainability goals without the necessary resources or capabilities to achieve them. Pressured by high sustainability expectations and market trends, these companies may commit to targets they cannot realistically meet due to financial, technological, or organizational limitations. Failing to fulfill these aspirations can erode trust in the company and undermine confidence in the broader sustainability agenda.

Why green allegations can be alarming for companies?

  1. Reputation at Stake: Portraying a false sense of environmental consciousness to consumers and stakeholders can damage a company's credibility and trustworthiness, leading to a loss of consumer confidence and loyalty. For large organizations, facing “green” allegations can have devastating consequences, as rebuilding trust once it's been lost can be incredibly challenging.
  2. Legal Consequences: As the practice of greenwashing escalates, corporations find themselves increasingly exposed to legal ramifications. Regulatory bodies are “sharpening” their scrutiny of environmental assertions, leaving no stone unturned in their quest for transparency. If authorities find evidence of deceptive practices, companies may face fines, penalties, or even legal action. The consequences of making false or misleading environmental claims can lead to legal repercussions, increasing the financial risks associated with greenwashing.
  3. Impact on Stakeholder Relationships: A company engaging in greenwashing can undermine trust with stakeholders, investors, employees, and suppliers. Greenwashing allegations for these key stakeholders, who are often deeply committed to the company's values and mission, may damage relationships and hinder progress toward shared goals. In the long term, this can jeopardize the company's long-term success. Thus, it is essential for companies to understand that their commitment to sustainability is not only important from an ethical standpoint but also plays a crucial role in building strong partnerships and achieving shared objectives with stakeholders.
  4. Undermining Genuine Sustainability Efforts: Companies engaging in greenwashing not only mislead consumers but also divert attention and resources from genuine sustainability efforts that can truly make a difference. This not only hampers progress toward environmental goals but also prevents companies from reaping the benefits of truly sustainable practices, such as cost savings, efficiency improvements, and enhanced brand reputation.

How can companies avoid the risks of greenwashing allegations?

  • Transparency and Accountability: To ensure transparency in their operations, companies should utilize verifiable data on greenhouse gas emissions. Accurate emissions data is crucial for making informed decisions, meeting sustainability goals, and achieving strategic objectives.
  • Data Accuracy and Integrity: To secure accuracy and integrity, companies need to choose a reliable source for primary, auditable, and actionable greenhouse gas emissions data.

  • Independent Verification: Engage third-party companies to assess and validate emissions data. Add credibility and assurance to the reported emissions figures, mitigating the risk of greenwashing and enhancing stakeholder trust.

Finally, we all know that accuracy and transparency are crucial to building trustworthy partnerships with our customers, consumers, and stakeholders. With regulations becoming increasingly stringent, reliable data is imperative in driving meaningful emissions reduction.

Let's Talk!

share on